[ad_1]
About the Awards is a series of Q&As with our editors across ALM Media publications aimed at informing readers and potential applicants of our awards judging process in relation to ALM’s Accredited Events. We hope this will guide you as you write your submissions, and welcome any other questions you may have.
This week, our annual Hosts in the Legal Division of Tech Law Awards will be discussed with Legaltech News Editor-in-Chief Stephanie Wilkins, who will guide the judges across all categories.
For more information on the 2023 Legalweek Leaders in Tech Law Awards, visit the benchmark site and the owner Call for Nominations. Deadline for submissions November 14, 2022. You can also view others ALM contest submission deadlines are coming soon a sign up for marketing newsletters here.
Stephanie, when did you start as the new Editor-in-Chief of Legaltech News?
I just started with Legaltech News on September 12, 2022, and my first two months have been great.
Can you tell us more about yourself and your legal background and background?
I have been writing in the legal and legal technology space for almost ten years. As a freelancer, I wrote regularly about legal technology for Above the Law and content creation and thought leadership for a range of legal technology companies and legal marketing firms. Before that, I attended NYU Law School and spent many years as a litigator in Biglaw litigation. I received my BA from the University of Notre Dame, where I studied Psychology, Sociology and Russian. Today I live in Brooklyn and am a professional photographer when I’m not writing about legal technology.
What do you think sets these brands apart from other competitors? For example, how does this differ from the California Attorney General’s Office of Technology Law?
The Legal Division Leaders in Technical Law Awards know that legal innovation occurs in every corner of the world and in every area of the law, which is why we offer awards in various categories. many. The California Leaders in Technology Law, in contrast, focused on new corporate law firms, firms and outsourcing providers for the technology industry in Silicon Valley. In our third year of presenting these awards, ALM and Legaltech News want to recognize law firms, legal departments and clients who are pursuing innovation and change across a variety of sectors. the legal profession.
Who wants to submit a nomination for this contest?
Corporate law firms, law firms, or outsourcing providers should submit a report that is proud of what they have done in the legal technology space over the past year. We love to see submissions from people who believe they are doing something unique in the industry, are adding something new to the legal technology conversation, and believe they will provide an example about how technology and innovation can help challenge law and order. to the future. That’s a high bar, but one of the former champions never shied away.
Who is the judge in this competition?
All entries are reviewed by ALM’s editorial staff, including myself and others affiliated with Law.com, Corporate Counsel, The American Lawyer, and other publications as appropriate. From there, we shortlist the contestants and send them to a panel of external judges, including senior in-house counsel, law firm partners and executives, legal professionals, judges and others. There is no peer review – for example, law firm judges do not review submissions from their competitors in law firm categories.
What do you look for in nominations?
We want to see unique, innovative and exciting work being done in the legal technology space, things that are changing the industry’s narrative and expectations. Don’t just tell us about a new product and a successful M&A transaction; tell me how where your development or work came from. Is there anything new about the workflows, the teams that worked together to succeed, the specific technology, or the technology application that made it possible? It’s important to note that these aren’t “best use of technology” brands, but rather “really new,” and there’s a lot to do with the situation.
What are you hoping to see in the nominations?
We want to see specifics, so we ask for multiple reasons for some of the categories. We don’t want misinformation about how “new” you are, we want to know how you are creative, why facts or figures that make your achievement unique, a why Your work is groundbreaking, groundbreaking, or game-changing. If appropriate, portions of submissions may be marked confidential, and we will consider those portions in our judgment. It is difficult, however, to award submissions marked as confidential, as we cannot fully explain why they won.
Our main goal is to get the best and most suitable information to judge the submissions and choose our winners.
Deadline for submissions for Legalweek’s Leaders in Legal Technology awards 2023 November 14, 2022.
For more information about the Legalweek Leaders in Tech Law Awards and other Recognition Events awards, please contact Recognition Events desk manager Pearl Wu at [email protected].
[ad_2]
Source link
