[ad_1]
A group of Stanford students called ‘Stanford Hates Fun’ plans to protest the university’s crackdown on free speech.
The incidents occurred at the football game between the Cardinal and Washington State Cougars on Saturday and are directly connected to a larger discussion about the ban on social life on campus.
Stanford hates fun and its move stems from a ban on university social work. Students say that the school has tried to limit the social life of students due to a lack of communication, a poor approach to group registration and funding, and strict policies.
Click here for more sports news on FOXNEWS.COM
According to many students, due to the new approach, the bureaucracy is too much and it is difficult to register social events on campus and in the university. This includes, but is not limited to, Greek life.
Numbers seem to back up that claim.
In 2019, the last school year without COVID-19 restrictions, 158 groups on campus registered with the university in the first month of the fall quarter. In 2022, only 45 groups registered on campus during the first month of the fall quarter.
The school’s student newspaper, The Stanford Daily, takes a close look at the whole situation from a first-hand perspective. Problems continue to rise over the university’s management of social life.
The Stanford Hates Fun movement was born out of organizational resistance.
At Stanford’s home football game against Arizona State, the Leland Stanford Junior University marching band – a very silly, fun-filled front – unfurled a flag next to the famous tree of the school It simply read, ‘STANFORD hates fun.’
In response to the award, Jordan Zietz belongs to the team. Zietz is wearing a wooden dress and helping to hold the collar.
Despite an initial tweet suggesting otherwise, he was suspended by the Association’s Executive Committee, not the university. The committee told the Stanford Daily that they decided to ban Zietz “because of his use of the program for personal gain without going through or questioning due process.” It said the decision had nothing to do with ‘War On Fun.’
However, it’s hard to imagine that Stanford isn’t breathing down the committee’s neck. Will the same decision be made without increasing university pressure?
Regardless of who made the decision, the rhetoric against the administration only grew. The Stanford Hates Fun project went up.
Students say the university suppressed their free speech on Saturday.
As the ‘War On Fun’ continues, a very large group of Stanford students – especially the small, almost non-existent ones from other areas of the world – have come to defeat. of the Cardinal to Washington State. Many of them wore #FreeTheTree shirts, some wore shirts in support of Stanford Hates Fun. They also took the first point and ended up suspending the Tree.
When they did, security entered the student section.
AT 5 IN THE SECONDARY AFTER COASTAL CAROLINA CROWD TORMS FIELD AFTER WINNING AT APPALACHIAN STATE.
A video from the game appears to show an increase in armed police and unarmed campus security for a game with very few fans. Most of them were standing near the student entrance.
Stanford Hates Fun says the issue goes deeper. It says Stanford violated its free speech obligations under California’s Leonard Act and plans to “pursue appropriate legal recourse.”
According to the group, students were prohibited from entering the football game with administrative prohibition signs and banners, regardless of size or orientation.
Points are not banned in football.
Stanford Stadium has posted a list of restricted items online and in the lobby, and the list does not include signage. At a game earlier this month, stadium workers also handed out signs to spectators.
However, the students’ grades were not accepted on Saturday.
“When we asked why they blocked the signs, the answers from different employees were different. So we have reason to believe that these signs were blocked because of their content,” Stanford said. Hates Fun to OutKick.
Stanford Hates Fun also claims that security stripped students of their clothing to confirm they were not wearing identification. Footage from the game shows students being tackled by officers as they try to enter the stadium.
One flag was brought into the game.
However, it came from a non-student entry. The group Stanford Hates Fun believes that security at other portals “was not informed of the planned ban.”
Security and Stanford officials tried to remove the banner, but were stopped by crowd support. The replacement mascot installed by the administration is a shirt that says “Stanford hates fun.”
Also, many party members chose to boycott the party on Saturday. Many of the band members who played during the game protested with the slogan ‘Stanford Hates Fun’ emblazoned on their t-shirts and instruments.
Click here to download the FOX NEWS app
Stanford students don’t plan to go quietly. They will continue to fight for their right to party.
OutKick has reached out to the university for comment but has not heard back. Stay tuned for updates.
[ad_2]
Source link