Read About Trump’s Legal Woes | Media Pyro

[ad_1]

The question is not whether Trump will be impeached but when, for what, and by whom. Even when it comes to violating Georgia’s election laws, which are many federal felonies, Trump is in the soup.

Last month, Bloomberg reported that Justice Department prosecutors believed they had gathered evidence to indict the former president for obstruction of justice stemming from the Mar-a-Lago documents. However, they haven’t had much to say to Attorney General Merrick Garland. The New York Times A security camera reportedly captured a longtime Trump staffer moving boxes after the announcement calling for the return of all classified documents. The Washington Post It was gathered that a Trump staffer told investigators that the documents had been moved at Trump’s direction after the announcement.

On Halloween alone, consider the number of terrifying investigations moving forward in Trump World: the anti-Oath Keepers trial; the criminal trial of Trump’s company in New York for tax evasion; the criminal trial of his close friend Tom Barrack, the head of his nomination committee, for allegedly acting as a foreign agent; the Trump civil lawsuit over Trump Tower workers’ assault on protesters on the Fifth Avenue; the defamation suit brought against Trump by E. Jean Carroll, the author accusing him of defamation; the Committee’s January 6 request for the former president to appear before the panel; the House Committee’s subpoena on his tax records (temporarily chaired by Chief Justice John Roberts); not to mention the very aggressive prosecution of voter fraud by the Fulton County attorney in Atlanta. Yes, yes, Senator Lindsey Graham lost a bid, the next day, to deny a request to appear before the Fulton County prosecutor—a reprimand issued by the Roberts Court.

“Of all the things Trump is investigating nationally, obstruction of justice is a slam dunk, and I think he will be prosecuted,” said Frank Figliuzzi, the FBI’s former director of counterintelligence. Bloomberg. Crime expert Jennifer Taub has written in the Every month one accuses Trump. (A lawsuit, or lawsuit, is another matter.)

The Mar-a-Lago documents are starting to look like a serious threat to the 45th president. This incident didn’t happen until a few months ago, unlike the investigations that have been going on since January 6th, more than 20 months. (Trump’s law enforcement is getting worse, and the Russia blunders of Robert Mueller’s investigation seem to have led to the Pleistocene Era.)

It would be a big deal if the Justice Department team had the tools to recommend Trump’s impeachment. Garland makes the final decision, but is a planner, a veteran of the DOJ, and respected among professional prosecutors. There’s no reason to think he would jump, if he thought the evidence wasn’t strong enough.

The vexing question is where an obstruction of justice claim is made in the literature. The Sixth Amendment guarantees that “the accused shall have the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and county where the crime was committed.” The obstruction of justice will be done in Palm Beach, where Trump married the documents, if the Justice Department can show that the obstruction first occurred in Washington when it removed the documents from the House. White continued to Florida, hence the lawsuit. can be managed in each district.

Trump has this going for him: Proving the case in Florida is bad for the state. As we saw in Trump’s case in favor of District Judge Aileen Cannon, Florida judges can benefit from Trump. His mentor in the dark arts of the law, disgraced attorney Roy Cohn, said, “Fuck the law. Who’s the judge?” Trump has always been at the heart of this ugly aphorism of justice.

He also fielded questions for the judges. If there is a MAGA on the judges of South Florida they will escape very bad, they have little patience for accusations that Trump has government documents and the government admits he was allowed to investigate whatever he wanted. After all, in their eyes, he was the president, the victim of a robbery.

Additional criminal charges will be filed against “Teflon Don.” Most of these are federal charges that Garland can file in the District of Columbia, which will give judges and juries a better decision in the federal case. Others are in Fulton County, where Trump pressed Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to “find” 11,283 votes after the election.

Trump’s legal team is considering whether to allow federal agents to return to Mar-a-Lago and conduct a surveillance search to comply with Justice Department requests for the return of all sensitive documents. government.

It is highly doubtful that such a follow-up search will be effective. Other stolen documents have been moved to Trump Tower, Bedminster or elsewhere. It’s inconceivable that Trump will leave more documents at Mar-a-Lago.

As if that wasn’t enough, the federal Judge David Carter in California, in a case involving the lawyer John Eastman — the mastermind behind sending Trump’s Hail Mary to the cancel the 2020 election — decided to send four emails in January. 6 Committee, despite the special privilege of the lawyer-applicant, because “they have enough connections with the conduct of criminal activities to the point of interference.”

In an email, Eastman wrote that despite the verification (for the Georgia state court) on December 1, 2021, he has learned that some voter fraud counts are incorrect. However, according to Carter, Trump signed a new verification, stating “under oath that the numbers entered are ‘true and correct’ or ‘believed to be true and correct’ to the satisfaction of his knowledge and faith.” Trump knew and believed otherwise. Lying under oath is considered perjury.

A candidate for Bill Clinton, Carter concluded that “emails show that President Trump knew the number of voter fraud was wrong but continued to publish those numbers, in court and the public. The Court finds that these emails are closely related to the establishment of intent.” Very offensive.

I think Garland will file multiple charges against Trump in D.C. A grand jury could indict Trump for a number of federal crimes, including the following:

  • He could accuse Washington of conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy, threats of violence, and obstruction of justice, including the certification of the 2020 election.
  • He could be prosecuted in Washington under the Espionage Act for obtaining documents related to national defense and mishandling government documents.
  • Or, now we are told that at least some of the purloined classified documents related to Iran’s missile program and China’s defense, another part of the Espionage Act, Title 18 US Code § 793(d) , come into play. That law makes it a crime against unauthorized persons, to detain and withhold release upon request of a person lawfully detained or granted a national security document.
  • He could be charged with wire fraud for receiving $250 million in donations to the Save America PAC by falsely and fraudulently claiming the election was stolen.

And that’s a long bill for the attorney general; those are just the ingredients. Of course, Garland doesn’t want to be the first AG to prosecute a former president and then fire him. Like a matador, he waits for the right moment to stab the bull.

[ad_2]

Source link

Avatar photo

About the author

Media Pyro is a site giving interesting facts about acer brand products. We also Provide information about your online Privacy Laws.