[ad_1]
The email comments were published on Wednesday Politics Show that former President Donald Trump’s legal team saw US Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas as their best chance to block congressional certification of President Joe Biden’s victory in the year 2020.
A former judge recently ordered Trump’s attorney John Eastman, the architect of the campaign to overturn the election, to share emails with the House Select Committee investigating the attack on January 6, 2021 at the US Capitol, temporarily delayed the certification process.
Thomas — who has faced calls to recuse himself from the court or recuse himself from 2020 election cases because of the actions of his wife Ginni Thomas, an alt-right activist, to help Trump retain power — and conduct emergency appeals from the 11th. Circuit, which includes Georgia.
“The point is that if the court says that the election may have been invalid, it makes sense that the Senate should not count Biden’s electoral votes from Georgia, right?” Trump’s lawyer Kenneth Chesebro wrote to several people including Eastman on December 31, 2020. the thought of Georgia, especially if [then-Vice President Mike] Pence has the legal power and the willingness to introduce himself to make it last longer.
“Thomas might end up being the main thing here – fair trial, right?” Chesebro continues. “We want to make things so that Thomas can be the person to come up with some kind of lifestyle or some other kind of circuit-judgment that says that Georgia is wrong. [January] 6, maybe the Georgia door will be taken to Congress, by Thomas—you agree, Prof. Eastman?”
Two hours later, Eastman responded: “I think I agree with this. If the court gives us a ‘maybe,’ that would be enough to kick out the Georgia Constitution, so the fact that I’ve got a lot of work. The calls from them show that they’re going to do that.”
Not long after, Chesebro wrote, while pending election laws at the district court level, “if we can bring this case before the Court Supreme” on January 5, “good and something good written by a judge or a judge. , I hope, Thomas, I think this is the best thing for us to keep the door of a government in Congress.”
Although the new report upset Thomas, Politics It said the Trump administration’s legal strategy “has not found strength in the Supreme Court. The outward signs of disagreement among the justices are mild, such as the December 11 order that was overturned by the Texas court to challenge election results in four other states. Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito issued a brief saying they had accepted jurisdiction over the case, but entered to the other judges to deny Texas any relief.”
The kind of ruling that Trump’s lawyers sought from Thomas before the full court is being weighed—as demonstrated last week with a pair of appeal-related orders for US Sen. Lindsey Graham (RS.C.) to appear before a special jury in Fulton County, Georgia investigating efforts to nullify the 2020 election in the state.
Thomas last week blocked Graham from testifying about calls he made to Georgia election officials shortly after Trump lost in 2020, but the full court on Tuesday reversed that. otherwise of course—no objection or objection—put Trump’s friend before the jury. later this month.
The release of Eastman’s emails also suggests Trump signed a legal document containing voter fraud claims he knew to be false, as a federal judge ruled last month —less than a week before the midterm elections, which will determine who will control Congress for the next two years and who will be in office 2024 games, including the presidential race.
Republican candidates who support the “Big Lie” Trump won in 2020, continue to cast doubt on the integrity of American elections on the campaign trail and fight against laws that say to restrict voter control, especially in swing states like Pennsylvania.
[ad_2]
Source link
