[ad_1]
After six weeks, there was really bad judgment between the people Johnny Depp and Amber Heard, the judge is very much on the side of the Pirates of the Caribbean actor at his end. In the Depp v. Heard the decision, Heard was found guilty on three counts of defamation and owed her a previous $15 million, but Depp was also found guilty on one count of Heard’s trial, two million dollars each. The latest news in this case is Depp’s appeal of his debts to Heard.
On Wednesday, Johnny Depp filed a 44-page appeal letter with his lawyers saying he should not be held liable for the $2 million fine ordered by the court in June. The documents say Heard’s claim is “grossly flawed” and say the court “should grant Mr. Depp’s motion for summary judgment,” respectively. Law & Crime. There are three reasons in a nutshell, starting with these words:
First, Mr. Depp cannot be sued for what Mr. Waldman said about the law. Mrs. Heard held Depp for the Waldman Statement on April 27 on the pure theory of vicarious liability, saying that Mr. customer. But legally, Mr. Smith is an independent contractor. Waldman, which is said to be fair, is not Mr. Depp. Indeed, numerous authorities support limiting client liability for attorney malpractice, and the Court should impose that same limit here.
Depp’s lawyers are arguing that the actor should not take legal action on behalf of one of his lawyers, Adam Waldman, who says that the claims made by Amber Heard are defamatory in his lawsuit. In Heard’s defamation suit, a jury found Heard guilty of one of three counts Waldman claimed, one count of damages totaling up to $2 million. Here’s the reason behind Depp’s new script:
Second, because Mrs. Heard against Depp at trial on a theory of vicarious liability, he must present evidence that Mr. Waldman every part of the crime, including his crime. No information about Mr. Waldman’s seriousness was released at the trial, so a conviction for Mr. Depp cannot be confirmed.
The claim believes that Waldman’s statement was “solely” the subject of Heard’s defamation suit, so it is believed that the court’s “decision was based on Mrs. Heard’s support for that one statement.” Here’s the final point:
Third, the April 27 Waldman Statement, viewed in context, is a non-implementation opinion statement insufficient to support a claim for defamation.
Elsewhere in the essay, pages of argument expand on the points listed as the three points above. If you want to check out the whole article, check it out Depp’s full story. Depp is looking to win back his ex-wife with this move after Heard appealed the decision.
Amber Heard this time trying to push his own decision on the grounds that both sides took advantage of the circumstances of the case, because it was “irrelevant and inconsistent.” His appeal also states that his victory in the England case should be included in the Virginia case.
As Depp and Heard continue to work with their lawyers on their defamation lawsuits, Johnny Depp is back in action, a French film about King Louis XV. On the other hand, Heard is said to be living in Spain under a pseudonym. We will update you here on CinemaBlend as developments arise.
[ad_2]
Source link
