[ad_1]
City Council members Phil Brock, Christine Parra and Oscar de la Torre proposed a plan to address “residents’ concerns”
By Dolores Quintana
The issue of the 16 ‘Builder’s Rescue’ requests filed during the Santa Monica Housing Project’s cancellation by the State of California is turning into a legal battle as reported by The Real Deal.com.
Doug Sloan, Santa Monica’s city attorney, said, The Real Deal.com said “We engaged outside counsel. It’s important to understand that, when looking at the This manufacturer’s medical issue with the Housing Act, the rules were not always clear, and the project seemed to differ from the government.at the Santa Monica City Council meeting.
Sloan explained, The Real Deal.com reported that “I don’t think in the last 18 months that the council or the staff could have done anything different to keep us out.” in response to a new motion for proposals by the Architect.
City Council members Phil Brock, Christine Parra and Oscar de la Torre have proposed a plan to address “residents’ concerns” about the permits and urge the council to “hire legal counsel outside”
Sloan and Brock did not respond to requests for comment on the matter, but at a City Council meeting Brock said that an Architect’s Recovery application was automatically approved for the 15-story building, ” beyond the pale” and “an unacceptable site for others. of the city.”
Sloan appears to have dropped hints of what the City Council will do as a legal strategy in trying to get the Architect’s proposals rejected. The 16 approved applications were submitted between February and October 14 of 2022 as the Santa Monica Housing Authority did not comply with the government’s mandate. Sloan plans to argue that the compliance date should be earlier, starting in early September of 2022 when the City Council sent a letter to the state department stating that the new section of Santa Monica Housing is “complete” and if approved by the City Council.
The new version of the Housing Plan was approved by the Santa Monica City Council on October 11, and the approved plan was approved by the administration a few days later.
Sloan said, as reported by The Real Deal.com, “We’re willing to argue…that’s the cut. So, some of these manufacturer’s medical requests that we’ve gotten in the past we may not have. do so.”
Although it is not known whether this legal strategy will be very effective, the validity of the requests that the manufacturer enforces in the courts has not been determined. According to state regulations, certification will be issued when the final version of the Santa Monica Housing and Housing Code is released in draft form in early September and will be updated periodically. between the letter and the final adoption of the Element by the Santa Monica. City Council.
WSC Communities attorney Dave Rand said during an interview, “I hope the city will be careful – like there are some projects that don’t work and some projects work,” Rand said. “But you have council members who are slow to grow. And they’re pushing their staff to push back on these projects, so this is never going to be a cakewalk. It’s going to be a fight.” WSC Communities is the company that has filed the most Builder Recovery applications in Santa Monica during the non-compliance period.
This legal battle will make the issue of Developer Recovery applications more difficult than ever, and may give developers the opportunity to participate in other cities that have not yet approved their Housing Elements by the state agency. . More than 100 cities in Southern California have foreclosed homes including the cities of Beverly Hills and West Hollywood.
Not all residents of Santa Monica are against these Builder’s Remedy projects, The Real Deal.com said, a resident who liked these projects wrote to comment on the project, “I write to encourage you to embrace Remedy Builder projects. .Santa Monica needs more homes and affordable housing, not wasted litigation!”
[ad_2]
Source link
