[ad_1]
A group of legal experts discussed the lessons the cannabis industry can learn from the history of US cannabis policy in a virtual conference hosted by Harvard Law School’s Petrie-Flom Center.
The panel, which discussed the effects of drug legalization in many countries on the psychiatric profession, was moderated by Mason Marks, a Florida State University Law Professor and a senior fellow at the Petrie- Flom Center. Also appearing at the event were law firm partners Hadas Alterman, Ariel Clark, and Vincent Sliwoski, as well as Vanderbilt Law School Professor Robert Mikos.
Alterman said many private businesses want to prepare for the potential decline in psychiatric drugs, and said the United States will need more doctors and psychiatrists if more drugs are legalized. psychoactive drugs.
“It’s the whole world of legal interests, corporate actions for medical opinions, interactions with government agencies, government agencies,” he said.
Clark said deregulation in some states has made the drug unaffordable. He said the psychedelics industry needs to “build partnerships” with the health care industry and other industries to avoid the “bad situation we see with cannabis.”
“We need to include religious and social activities, the laws and taxes should be minimal. The cost of these medicines – should be very inclusive,” he said. Otherwise, “psychiatry will resemble what we see in the medical profession and in this country where health care and medicine are very expensive for some.”
Alterman also said that regulation of the psychedelics industry is necessary to keep society fair.
“At the most important level, we need consistent, safe, high-quality care across the board. We need certified professionals who perform at or above the same standard of care, who are highly trained to doing this,” he said. “It’s a balancing act between protecting consumers and not over-regulating.”
In addition, Clark said that the laws for psychotherapists should also include religious and recreational uses of drugs, rather than medical applications.
“We have to have all these different types and styles of access and meet people where they are,” Clark said. “And it has to be inclusive and not like the way of medicine, the way of medicine – it’s not a cultural idea.”
Carmel D. Shachar, executive director of the Petrie-Flom Center, said in an interview that the event was held in light of Colorado’s election, Proposition 122, which asked voters to balance on the reduction and regulation of certain minds.
“I hope that what people take away from this event – no matter where they stand on the validation of psychology – is that it’s very difficult to move, to manage these. [substances] from the criminal system to empowerment,” Shachar said.
[ad_2]
Source link
