[ad_1]
He said that the life cycle of court work was a new test that showed how technology can change the legal system and said that the work of the high courts and district judges should be given life.
He said that the life cycle of court work was a new test that showed how technology can change the legal system and said that the work of the high courts and district judges should be given life.
Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud on Saturday said that the structure of the legal profession is “feudal, patriarchal and not accommodating of women” and there is a need for a democratic and meritocratic process for the entry of women and small sections of society.
Justice Chandrachud, who presided as the CJI on Wednesday, said that there are many challenges ahead of the trial and the first is hope because social and legal issues and many political issues are involved. in the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.
“One thing we need to understand is the judge’s source of nutrition. The source of nutrition that determines who enters the judiciary is very much dependent on the structure of the legal profession.
“The structure of the legal profession till today across India is feudal, patriarchal and does not include women,” the CJI, known for expressing honest opinions, said in the Hindustan Times Leaders Conference.
“So, when we talk about more women in the judiciary, it’s just as important for us to lay the building blocks for the future by getting women involved now. That’s the first step.” going into the attorney general’s chambers is a boys’ club,” he said.
“How do you get into chambers by trying to make connections? Until we have democratic and merit-based access to the legal profession where there won’t be more women, and there are more people from marginalized groups,” he said. said.
He said that the life cycle of court work was a new test that showed how technology can change the legal system and said that the work of the high courts and district judges should be given life.
“One of the main dangers in a constitutional democracy is the danger of being opaque. When you open up your process you produce a degree of accountability, transparency and produce a kind of response to the needs of the citizens,” he said.
“When I talk about life cycle, I’m not talking about life cycle on big ticket cases. We have to live life on High Court proceedings except for regional trials because the interface of the citizens first and foremost in the local judiciary,” the CJI said.
On the issue of comparison between the Indian Supreme Court and the US Supreme Court, CJI Chandrachud said that it is important that the high court here should not be compared with other developed countries because “it is a structure India is unique for our industry.”
“If you compare us to the US Supreme Court which hears a total of over 180 cases a year, or the UK Supreme Court which hears 85 cases a year we have a Court Supreme Court where judges hear about 75 to 80 cases on Monday and Friday. 30 to 40 cases on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday. That gives you the job of the Supreme Court. .”
“Most of the cases we deal with don’t get in the newspapers or the cases that are considered big enough to handle on social media. These are just cases.”
“So, the question is whether a Supreme Court judge has spent the country handling minor cases like pension and maintenance. My answer is yes because that is what the Supreme Court does,” he said. .
Mr. Chandrachud that the ability of the courts to grow as a judicial institution in a democracy depends on the confidence that emerges in the minds of the people.
The CJI said judges are often considered old because they wear black and beautified clothes.
“When you combine that with a loud voice and a legal voice it can make for a very boring combination. But to borrow that song by Doris Day and Frank Sinatra – ‘We’re in the Heart of the Children’, ” he said.
[ad_2]
Source link
